Reading Culture Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Reading Culture - Es think ExampleAccording to Foucault, this is so effective and in incident the guard does non have to always be present. Foucault argues using this illusion that the structure of power in the society resembles the one existing at the Panopticon. She continues to aver that the power of control the manner in which society acts originates from institution formation. The formed institutions then form kinds of behaviors considered wrong or right. As people are elevated and age, they learn the norms of the institutions and remain vigilant not to go against them. From this, people have a perception that there is one empowered authoritative figure that exercises part over the general society. But just like Panopticon that does not need a guard to be present to remain effective, the society institutions do not need an empowered authoritative figure. In essence, all members of the society act as authority since everyone indicate the significance of following the institu tional norms by perform them. In fact Foucault asserts that there is no need any longer for an empowered authoritative figure since the society system is already set, there is the aim of illusion. In his essay, Foucault continues to say that power continues due to the application of discipline. She explains hat discipline is a technique used in exercising power. We can therefore say that discipline is basically a tool that is used to allow continuation of or strengthen power. People fear violating the norms and rules not just because they were generated by something or someone with power, but they are afraid to do so because they know that violating the norms and rules would make them victims of disciplinary sanction. John Berger in his essay Ways of seeing, Berger argues that the manner in which people perceive or view art is personally dictated by them, but by those who are seen as the experts and elites of art. This is an illustration of Panopticism in that some people perceiv e art in the manner in which an assumed authority informs them. In his essay, Berger demonstrates the way in which catalogues of art emphasize the significance of the background knowledge information that is identified with the art work rather than the factual meaning of art itself. He continues to say that art catalogues do not deal with the depict meaning, but rather deals with the people who had the painting commissioned, the likely date of the art, the legal squabbles, people who own the art, and the families of the owners of the art. This means that the perceived experts of art only focus on the paintings background information basically to have the painting assessed. This is because these perceived art experts writing the catalogues are also the perceived institution governance by majority of people. Hence, just like Panopticon, people look at art the way they feel subject authority would prefer them to perceive it. Bergers work demonstrates the power exhibited by an empowe red authoritative figure in the system of Panopticon. However, the art critics and elites that he refers to in his writing do not entirely hold power for reasons of being perceived as the authority. Power and authority are, through the use of discipline, demonstrated. The writings of Laura Kipnis expound the idea of Panopticism and demonstrate the manner in whi